p. 1−16
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 17−33
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 35−49
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 51−63
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 65−75
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 77−89
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 91−100
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 101−112
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 113−126
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 127−139
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 141−155
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 157−170
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 171−180
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 181−192
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 193−205
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 207−222
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 223−244
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
i) and measuring this unreliability () by Shanon has been stated as below in which the greater dispersion in the values of an indicator, the more important that indicator is. Results and Discussion Due to the importance of sustainability in development and sustainable development in recent years, so many investigations have been done in various domains and in dimensions such as economical, environmental and physical ones. According to the results obtained from this study, physical criterion which includes (construct, accessibility and vicinity) is the main criterion considered by experts with numerical weight of 0.544. Social, economic and environmental dimensions are respectively at next level of priority. For the same reason physical dimension is emphasized as the main influential factor in Tabriz sustainable development in this study. At the next step dimensions of sustainable development were analyzed and the role that each dimension plays on civil areas was studied and below conclusions were obtained: Of 66 indices for analysing sustainable development dimensions in Tabriz city, 7 indices belonged to economic dimension, 14 to social dimension, 8 to environmental dimensions and remaining are applied for physical dimension that the obtained results are summarized as below: At economic dimension districts 4, 1 and 2 with scores of 6.14, 5.46 and 4.95 scores obtained first, second and third scores of indicators and district 10 gained the lowest score. Conclusion Sustainable development is the dominant paradigm in the third millennium. This theory has been expanded in proposed period of time with a glance to environmental discussion and with the aim of preventing environmental deterioration and has been drawn to different discussions after passing a short time. Sustainable development encounters with inappropriate production, distribution and nature destructive pattern that its final purpose is to control environmental damages and increasing the quality of life. This study has been conducted with the aim of prioritizing sustainable development dimensions at the first stage and weighting civil districts based on the same dimensions. The results obtained from this study indicated that physical dimension is at the first priority among other dimensions.]]>
p. 245−260
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 261−278
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75
p. 279−292
2717-3534
Vol.25/No.75