Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph. D student in in Geography and urban planning, factually of geographical science and planning, university of Isfahan

2 Associate Professor in Geography and urban planning, factually of geographical science and planning, university of Isfahan

3 Professor in Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, university of Isfahan

10.22034/gp.2020.10777

Abstract

Introduction
In the present world and with the development of cities and urbanization, citizens’ mental health is at risk. In other words, rapid growth of the cities can be considered as one of the threats to the environment which influence the residents of the cities i.e. humans by devastating effects on their soul and body. Studies have shown that the quality of the constructed life environments and urban neighborhoods affects the citizens’ mental health. If we accept that the quality of the constructed environments affects the mental health, in this physical environment housing plays an important role in the indicators of mental health, because people spend much of their time at home and their residential environment. With this approach, this research is mainly aimed at investigating the mutual relationship of different patterns of residential densities on the indicators of the citizens’ mental health in Mardavich neighborhood, Isfahan.
 
Methodology
The main goal of this research is investigating the mutual relationship between quantitative indicators of housing and the citizens’ mental health. In this regards, independent variables include different types of housing patterns, household density in the residential unit, and density of peoples living in a room. Depression and perceived stress are dependant variables of the research.
For measuring people’s stress, perceived stress scale by Cohen et al. (1983) was used and for measuring depression, the second edition of depression questionnaire by Beck et al. (BDI-II) was used.
The research population includes the households living in Mardavich neighborhood. Regarding the fact that no precise statistics were available, for filling the questionnaires, 250 questionnaires were distributed among the households and at the end, 231 correctly filled questionnaires were gathered.
 
Results and Discussion
One of the independent variables of the research is housing pattern. In this research, the respondents’ homes were analyzed in three classes including house, apartment, and high-rise residential complexes. The results showed that the average depression and perceived stress in houses and apartments are much lower than high-rise residential complexes. Statistically, there is an almost strong relationship between different housing patterns and mental health indicators.
The second independent variable of the research is building density. The results of the present research showed that with the increase of building density, the average scores of depression and perceived stress also increase. Statistically, building density has a relationship with the variable of depression with the correlation coefficient of 0.518 and also, it has a relationship with perceived stress with the correlation coefficient of 0.464.
The other independent variable of the research is the per capita residential land. The results of the present research showed that there is a negative relationship between the per capita housing and mental health indicators. Actually, with the increase of per capita housing and allocation of more land area to every individual, stress and depression will be decreased. Statistically, the correlations between the indicator of per capita housing and the dependant variables i.e. depression and perceived stress are respectively equal to 0.447 and 0.373.
The forth independent variable of the research is the density of people living in a room. According to the obtained results, with the increase of people density in a room, depression and perceived stress will also increase. Statistically, people density in a room has a significant and positive relationship with depression and perceived stress with the respective correlation coefficients of 0.405 and 0.380.
In the following, for investigating the fact that which of the independent variables has a stronger effect on perceived stress and depression, modeling of the changes of depression and perceived stress levels is done based on quantitative indicators of housing by stepwise linear regression.
According to the results, significance level of F statistics for the indicators of perceived stress and depression is equal to 0.000 in the proposed models. This finding which is the result of regression analysis by variance analysis suggests that the research conceptual model has an appropriate goodness of fit.
The results of perceived stress showed that for the changes of this indicator, we can propose a model based on the indicator of building density. It means that of the four independent variables, building density has the strongest effect on perceived stress. Finally based on the proposed model, building density can predict 47 percent of the changes of this indicator.
According to the proposed models, the two indicators of building density and people density in a room are introduced as the predictive indicators of the variable of depression. Actually, the results of stepwise linear regression analysis for the variable of depression showed that two models can be proposed for the changes of this variable. In the first model, building density is the only predictive indicator which predicts 51.9 percent of the changes of depression. In the second model, the two indicators of building density and people density in room can respectively predict 42.6 and 16.7 percent of the changes of depression.
Conclusion
In general, it can be stated that all the independent variables of the research i.e. the quantitative indicators of housing have a significant relationship with mental health indicators i.e. depression and perceived stress. So, this research hypothesis which is consistent with many other works is approved and it suggests that there is a significant relationship between quantitative indicators of housing and mental health indicators. Therefore, by improving the quantitative indicators of housing, people’s mental health can be improved. This fact suggests that the communication between housing planning experts and psychologists should be strengthened more than the past in order to be able to control the negative effect of increased density on mental health indicators.

Keywords

Main Subjects

- آقایاری هیر، توکل، عباس زاده، محمد و گراوند، فرانک (1395)، مطالعه سلامت‌روانی و عوامل فردی و محله ای مؤثر بر آن، برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، سال هفتم، شماره 27، صص. 145-187.
- بذرافشان، جواد، شایان، محسن و بازوند، سجاد (1396)، ارزیابی عوامل تأثیرگذار پایداری مسکن در مناطق روستایی شهرستان زرین­دشت، جغرافیا و برنامه­ریزی، سال 21، شماره 62، صص. 41-59.
-روستایی، شهریور و کرمی، سونیا (1396)، بررسی تأثیر مالکیت مسکن در استقلال تصمیم‌گیری و نقش آفرینی زنان در شهر (مورد: سنندج)، جغرافیا و برنامه­ریزی، سال 21، شماره 59، صص. 123-151.
-رضویان، محمّد‌تقی (1381)، برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات منشی.
-زیاری، کرامت­الله و قاسمی­قاسموند، عزت­الله (1395)، ارزیابی شاخص­های کمّی و کیفی مسکن با رویکرد توسعه پایدار، مطالعه موردی: شهر سامان، پژوهش­های جغرافیای برنامه­ریزی شهری، دوره 4، شماره 2، صص. 197-221.
-زیاری، کرامت­الله، پشاه­آبادی، شهرام، حاجی، مهسا و مرادی، اسعد (1394)، ارزیابی تطبیقی سیر تحول شاخص­های مسکن شهر مریوان با نقاط شهری استان کردستان و کشور ایران، مطالعات شهری، شماره 15، صص. 37-52.
-زنگنه، مهدی (1394)، تحلیل فضایی وضعیت مسکن در کلانشهر مشهد با تأکید بر شاخص‌های توسعه پایدار شهری، مطالعات و پژوهش­های شهری و منطقه ای، سال 7، شماره 27، ص. 137-154.
-سلطانی، لیلا و دارابی، مریم (پاییز 1395)، ارزیابی کیفیت محیط در محله های تاریخی شهرها (مطالعه موردی: محله نفرآباد شهر ری)، پژوهش های جغرافیای انسانی، سال 48، شماره 3، صص. 429-439.
-ستارزاده، داوود (1388) بررسی شاخص­های جمعیتی مسکن ایران در سال 1385، جمعیت، شماره 67 و 68، صص. 57-79.
-صفاری­نیا، مجید (1390)، تأثیر محیط­های مسکونی مختلف بر سلامت‌روان، شادکامی و بهزیستی شخصی دختران نوجوان، پژوهشهای روانشناسی اجتماعی، دوره 1، شماره 1، صص. 60-73.
-عزیزی، محمد مهدی (1382)، تراکم در شهرسازی،  تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
عابدینی، اصغر و کریمی، رضا (1394)، بررسی و رتبه بندی مناطق چهارگانه شهر ارومیه براساس شاخص­های کمّی و کیفی مسکن، مطالعات و پژوهش­های شهری و منطقه­ای، سال 6، شماره 24، صص. 49-64.
-عینی‌فر، علیرضا و قاضی‌زاده، ندا (1389)، گونه‌شناسی مجتمع‌های مسکونی تهران با معیار فضای باز، آرمانشهر، شماره 5، صص. 35-45.
-محمدزاده، رحمت (1394)، بررسی تأثیر مالکیت مسکن در استقلال تصمیم گیری و نقش آفرینی زنان در شهر( مورد: سنندج)، جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دوره 19، شماره 54، صص. 279-302.
-میرغلامی، مرتضی، قره بگلو، مینو، نوزمانی، نوشین، (1396)، ارزیابی تأثیر ابعاد اجتماعی و کالبدی محیط محله بر سلامت‌روانی و حس سلامتی ساکنین، هنرهای زیبا، معماری و شهرسازی، دوره 22، شماره 2، صص. 63-74.
 
-Anderson, N. B., Johnson, S., Belar, C., Breckler, S., Nordal, K., & Ballard, D. (2012). Stress in America: Our health at risk. American Psychological Association.
-Agarwal, Siddharth and Satyavada, Aravinda and Kaushik, Sambandhan and Kumar, Rajeev, Urbanization, Urban Poverty and Health of the Urban Poor: Status, Challenges and the Way Forward (March 2, 2018). Demography India, Vol. 36, No. 1, 121-134.
-Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, 78(2), 490-498.
-Clark, C., Myron, R., Stansfeld, S., & Candy, B. (2007). A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of the built and physical environment on mental health. Journal of public mental health, 6(2), 14-27.
-Chen, M., Liu, W., & Tao, X. (2013). Evolution and assessment on China's urbanization 1960–2010: under-urbanization or over-urbanization?. Habitat International, 38, 25-33.
-Carmody, D. P. (2005). Psychometric characteristics of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with college students of diverse ethnicity. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 9(1), 22-28.
-Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., Chan, H. Y. E., & Saltzman, H. (2000). Housing quality and mental health. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68(3), 526.
-Evans, G. W., Saegert, S., & Harris, R. (2001). Residential density and psychological health among children in low-income families. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 165-180.
-Evans, G. W., Lercher, P., & Kofler, W. W. (2002). Crowding and children's mental health: the role of house type. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(3), 221-231.
-Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: a review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of social issues, 59(3), 475-500.
-Gong, Y., Palmer, S., Gallacher, J., Marsden, T., & Fone, D. (2016). A systematic review of the relationship between objective measurements of the urban environment and psychological distress. Environment international, 96, 48-57.
-Hood, E. (2005). Dwelling disparities: how poor housing leads to poor health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(5), 310-317.
-Ho, H. C., Lau, K. K. L., Yu, R., Wang, D., Woo, J., Kwok, T. C. Y., & Ng, E. (2017). Spatial variability of geriatric depression risk in a high-density city: a data-driven socio-environmental vulnerability mapping approach. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(9), 994.
-Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Moving to opportunity: an experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1576-1582.
-Lawrence, R. J. (2006). Housing and health: beyond disciplinary confinement. Journal of Urban Health, 83(3), 540-549.
-Lederbogen, F., Kirsch, P., Haddad, L., Streit, F., Tost, H., Schuch, P., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011). City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature, 474(7352), 498.
-Li, J., & Liu, Z. (2018). Housing stress and mental health of migrant populations in urban China. Cities, 81, 172-179.
-Lee, E. H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian nursing research, 6(4), 121-127.
-Mitchell, R. E. (1971). Some social implications of high density housing. American Sociological Review, 18-29.
-Madebo, W. E., Yosef, T. T., & Tesfaye, M. S. (2016). Assessment of perceived stress level and associated factors among health care students at Debre Birehane University, North Shoa Zone of Amgara Region, Ethiopia. HCCR, 4, 2. 1-9.
-Melis, G., Gelormino, E., Marra, G., Ferracin, E., & Costa, G. (2015). The effects of the urban built environment on mental health: A cohort study in a large northern Italian city. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(11), 14898-14915.
-Northridge, M. E., Sclar, E. D., & Biswas, P. (2003). Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. Journal of Urban Health, 80(4), 556-568.
-Ochodo, C., Ndetei, D. M., Moturi, W. N., & Otieno, J. O. (2014). External built residential environment characteristics that affect mental health of adults. Journal of Urban Health, 91(5), 908-927.
-Rollings, K. A., Wells, N. M., Evans, G. W., Bednarz, A., & Yang, Y. (2017). Housing and neighborhood physical quality: Children's mental health and motivation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 50, 17-23.
-Ram, B., Shankar, A., Nightingale, C. M., Giles-Corti, B., Ellaway, A., Cooper, A. R., & Cook, D. G. (2017). Comparisons of depression, anxiety, well-being, and perceptions of the built environment amongst adults seeking social, intermediate and market-rent accommodation in the former London Olympic Athletes’ Village. Health & place, 48, 31-39.
-Sha, M., & Tian, G. (2010). An analysis of spatiotemporal changes of urban landscape pattern in Phoenix metropolitan region. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, 600-604.
-Satcher, D., Okafor, M., & Dill, L. J. (2012). Impact of the built environment on mental and sexual health: policy implications and recommendations. ISRN Public Health, Volume 2012, Article ID 806792, 7 pages.
-Srivastava, K. (2009). Urbanization and mental health. Industrial Psychiatry Journal 18 (2): 75–76.
-Saarloos, D., Alfonso, H., Giles-Corti, B., Middleton, N., & Almeida, O. P. (2011). The built environment and depression in later life: the health in men study. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(5), 461-470.
-Sullivan, W. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). Mental health and the built environment. In making healthy places (pp. 106-116). Island -Press, Washington, DC.
-Wandersman, A., & Nation, M. (1998). Urban neighborhoods and mental health: Psychological contributions to understanding toxicity, resilience, and interventions. American Psychologist, 53(6), 647-656.
-Xiao, Y., Miao, S., Sarkar, C., Geng, H., & Lu, Y. (2018). Exploring the Impacts of Housing Condition on Migrants’ Mental Health in Nanxiang, Shanghai: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(2), 225.