Explaining the effect of space quality as a public benefit in reducing earthquake vulnerability Case study:

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student of Urban Planning Department, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Geography & Rural Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

10.22034/gp.2024.62233.3269

Abstract

Introduction

The concept of space quality is the product of various conditions and variables, which are actually the influential elements in space-geographical place. The objectivism of space plays a prominent role in every city and establishes mutual relations with critical situations such as earthquakes. In this article, the quality of space is considered as a benefit or a public good that has functional, perceptual and physical dimensions. The public benefit is not only considered in the conventional sense of urban services and their equal distribution, but it is a public benefit and good.

Methods: Text

The research method is descriptive and analytical. A number of 120 people have been questioned randomly from the residents of Zone 1 of Tabriz Municipality.Results: Text

Conclusions: The research results indicate that the quality of space has a significant effect on reducing vulnerability to earthquakes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Full Text

هدف : مفهوم کیفیت فضا محصول شرایط و متغیرهای مختلفی است که همین عوامل در واقع عناصر تاثیرگذار در فضا – مکان جغرافیایی است. ابژکتیویسم فضا ، در هر شهری نقش پررنگی دارد و با  وضعیت های بحرانی مانند زلزله  روابط متقابلی برقرار می کند. در این مقاله کیفیت فضا، به مثابه منفعت یا کالایی عمومی در نظر گرفته شده است که دارای ابعاد کارکردی، ادراکی و کالبدی است.   منفعت عمومی صرفا به معنای مرسوم خدمات شهری و توزیع برابر آن ها نگریسته نمی شود بلکه منفعت و کالایی عمومی است.  بررسی میدانی تاثیر کیفیت فضا و بهره مندی از کالاهای عمومی بر کاهش آسیب های ناشی از زلزله در منطقه یک شهرداری تبریز است.

روش: روش تحقیق توصیفی تحلیلی است. تعداد 120 نفر به صورت تصادفی از ساکنان منطقه1  شهرداری تبریز مورد پرسشگری قرار گرفته اند.

نتایج : نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن است که کیفیت فضا در کاهش آسیب پذیری در برابر زلزله تاثیر معنی داری دارد.

نتیجه گیری: میانگین معنادار هر یک از انواع سرمایه اجتماعی در خروجی آزمون U-Man Vitny نشان  می دهد که کاهش آسیب پذیری در برابر بحران زلزله در منطقه تبریز به بازتولید و تکثیر سرمایه اجتماعی در مقیاس خیابان، محله و شهر تبریز بستگی دارد.

References

Alexander, E. (2020), The public interest in planning: from legitimation to substantive plan evaluation, Planning Theory, 1, (2): 246-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2154824
Alonso W.(1975), Location Theory, Cambridge, MIT
Alonso, W, (1971), Economics of Urban Size, papers of the regional science association,.26: 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231186810
Alberti M. & Wang T.(2022). Detecting patterns of vertebrate biodiversity across the multidimensional urban landscape, Ecology letters, 25: 1027-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022. 102936
Baldvin C., Leonard R., (2002), quality of life and attendance in primary schools, the university of Newcastle press
Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. (2019), Utilitarianism’s bad breathe? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning, Planning Theory.1(2):163-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08128-6
Daneshpour, Z., (2006), Improving Urban Problem- Solving Approaches, the Case of Tehran , Life in the Urban Landscape, International Conference for Integrating Urban Knowledge & Practice: Sweden
Harvey, D., (1973), Social Justice and City, Oxford Press.
Habrmas,J., (1984), On Reconstruction of Historical Materialism, tr. By Shapiro, Heinemann, London
Habermas J. (1987), The theory of communicative action; life world and system: a critique of functionalist reason, trans by: Tomas McCarty, Boston: Beacon Press
Hagerty, C.C., Coleman, T.L. and Long, O., 2004, Supervised and Unsupervised Neural Modelsfor Multispectral Image Classification, ISPRS, http://www.isprs.org/istanbul2004/comm7/papers/20.pdf.
Henderson V., (2000), How Urban Concentration Affects Economic Growth, World Bank Working Paper, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Jones N.(2019), Environmental activation of citizens in the context of policy agenda formation and influence of social capital, Social science,47: 121- 136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08128-6
Lawton M. P., (1991), Back ground: a multi dimentional view of quality of life in frail elder in Sandiago, academic press
Moroni, S. (2004), Toward a reconstruction of the public interest criterion, Planning Theory,3,(2): 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826032000145070
Mazza, L. (1990), Planning as a moral craft, Planning Theory,2,(3): 47-50. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00277-5
Rahman, M(2003), measuring the quality of life across countries, sensitive analysis of well- being indice wider international conference on inequality, poverty and human well being, may, 30-31, Helsinki, Finland
Nakamura, R., (1985), Agglomeration Economics in Urban Manufacturing Industries: A case of Japanese Cities, Journal of Urban Economics,17,(1): 108- 124. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0309132516686011
Philips, D. (2006), quality of life, Routledge, London and New York
Quigly , J., (1998), Urban Diversity and Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12,(2): 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.551
Rubinowicz P. & Czynska K. (2015). Study of city landscape heritage using radar data and 3d city models, 36th symposium on remote sensing of environment, Germany
Southworth, M. (2005). Reinventing main street ; from mall to townscape mall, Journal of urban design  10 (2):151-170. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.551
Sen A., (1999), Development as freedom, Oxford university press
Tweed C and Sutherland M.( 2007), Built cultural heritage and sustainable development , Land use and Urban planning,83: 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826032000145070
Tobias S., Wahl P. M., (2020), Can place branding support landscape conservation in city regions? A case study from Switzerland, Land Use Policy,30:266– 275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516686011

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics