Journal of Geography and Planning

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Peer Review Process

Indexing and Abstracting

Statistics of Journals

FAQ

News

Related Links

Probing the Relationship between Urban Primacy and Economic Development: A Cross-country Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Sharif University of Technology

2 Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Science and Technology

Abstract

According to a prevalent belief since the 1960s, patterns of national spatial systems have been thought to be dynamically transmuted appropriate to the levels of national economic growth and development until a rather balanced and efficient hierarchy of city-sizes is realized. This evolutionary process can be divided into two significant phases backed by the theories of “neoclassical economic equilibrium” and “polarized development”. That is, at the initial phase of development, economic growth essentially leads to resources and population concentration in a few core cities entitled “primate cities.” After that, in the second phase of development, sufficient degree of economic expansion would lead to gradual reduction of “urban primacy” through dispersion of growth factors and population throughout the nation. In view of economic principles, the aforementioned dispersive process would inevitably come to pass as a result of emerged diseconomies arising out of excessive agglomeration, congestion, and negative externalities within the primate cities. Based on this “nonlinear (inverted U-shape) model” and the “negative unidirectional relationship” suggested by some researchers, numerous time-series and cross-country studies using various indexes have investigated the existence and behavior of the mentioned interrelation. But upshot of these researches is contradictory and inconclusive until now. We aim at elucidating and probing into this disputation. So, for controlling the distortions caused by the diversity of primacy and development indexes employed in previous studies, we use 8 primacy indexes and 3 development indexes of 67 countries in the year 2000. Our statistical tests with varied (unidirectional and nonlinear) mathematical functions reveal that, aggregately, there is not any significant “cross-country” relationship between urban primacy and economic development.

Keywords

References
1ـ توفیق، فیروز (1372)، «تحلیل عاملی و تلفیق شاخص­های منطقه­ای»، آبادی، شـماره 10، سال سوّم، صص 15-11.
2ـ زبردست، اسفندطار (1386)، «بررسی تحوّلات نخست­شهری در ایران»، هنرهای زیبا، شماره 29، صص 38-29.  
3ـ صرافی، مظفر (1377)، «مبانی برنامه­ریزی توسعه منطقه­ای»، تهران، سازمان برنامه و بودجه.
4ـ کلانتری، خلیل (1382)، «پردازش و تحلیل داده­ها در تحقیقات اجتماعی-اقتصادی»، تهران، انتشارات شریف.
5- Ades, A.F. and E.L. Glaeser (1995), “Trade and Circuses: Explaining Urban Giants,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 1, pp. 195-227.
6- Alonso, W. (1980), “Five Vell Shapes in Development,” Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 45, pp. 5-16.
7- Alperovich, G. (1992), “Economic Development and Population Concentration,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 63-74 
8- Berry, B. (1961), “City Size Distributions and Economic Development,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 573-588.
9- Carroll, G.R. (1980), “National City-size Distributions: What Do We Know after 67 Years of Research?” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 6, pp. 1-43.
10- Cohen, B. (2004), “Urban Growth in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Trends and a Caution Regarding Existing Forecasts,” World Development, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 23-51.
11- De Cola, L. (1984), “Statistical Determinants of the Population of a Nation's Largest City,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 71-98.
12- Dehghan, F. and G.V. Uribe (1999), “Analysing Mexican population Concentration: A Model with Empirical Evidence,” Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 1269- 1281.
13- Douglass, M. (2006), “On the Epistemology of Rural RegionalDevelopment Models:From Developmental State to NeoliberalIdeologies in Pacific Asia”, SeoulNationalUniversity.
14- El-Shakhs, S. (1972), “Development, Primacy and Systems of Cities,” The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 7, pp. 11-36.
15- Friedmann, J. (1966), “Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela”, Cambridge: MIT Press.
16- Hansen, N. (1996), “Regional Development Policies: Past Problems and Future Possibilities,” Canadian Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 19, pp. 107-18.
17- Henderson, J.V. (2000), “How Urban Concentration Affects Economic Growth”, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
18- Jefferson, M. (1939), “The Law of the PrimateCity,” Geographical Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 226-232.
19- Kamerschen, D. (1969), “Further Analysis of Overurbanization,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 235-253.
20- Kim, S. (2008), “Spatial Inequality and Economic Development: Theories, Facts, and Policies”, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
21- Kuznets, S. (1955), “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review, Vol. 45, pp. 1-28.
22- Lipshitz, G. (1992), “Divergence Versus Convergence in Regional Development,” Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 123-138.
23- Mehta, S.K. (1969), “Some Demographic and Economic Correlates of Primate Cities: A Case for Revaluation,” In Breese, G. (ed.), The City in Newly Developing Countries, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
24- Moomaw, R.L. and A.M. Shatter (1996), “Urbanization and Economic Development: A Bias toward Large Cities?,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 13-37.
25- Moomaw, R.L. and M.A. Alwosabi (2004), “An Empirical Analysis of Competing Explanations of Urban Primacy Evidence from Asia and the Americas,” The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 38, pp.149-171.
26- Mutlu, S. (1989), “Urban Concentration and Policy Revisited: An Analysis and Some Policy Conclusions,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 611-639.
27- Nitsch, V. (2003), “Does History Matter for Urban Primacy? The Case of Vienna,” Regional Scienceand Urban Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 401-418.
28- Noorbakhsh, F. (2001), “Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran: A Policy Mode”l, University of Glasgow.
29- Parr, J.B. (1985), “A Note on the Size Distribution of Cities over Time,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 199-212.
30- Richardson, H.W. (1980), “Polarization Reversal in Developing Countries,” Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 45, pp. 67-85.
31- Rosen, K.T. and M. Resnick (1980), “The Ssize Distribution of Cities: An Examination of the Pareto Law and Primacy,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 165-186.
32- Sharbatoghlie, A. (1990), Urban Agglomeration and Regional Disparities in Iran: Continuity and Change in the Postrevolutionary Period, Ph.D. Dissertation, BostonCollege.
33- Sheppard, E. (1982), “City Size Distributions and Spatial Economic Change,” International Regional Science Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 127–151
34- Short, J.R. and L.M. Pinet-Peralta (2009), “Urban Primacy: Reopening the Debate,” Geography Compass 3/3, pp. 1245-1266
35- UN (2004), World Urbanization Prospect: The 2003 Revision, New York: United Nations Publication.
36- UNDP (2002), “Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World”, New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
37- Wheaton, W.C. and H. Shishido (1981), “Urban Concentration, Agglomeration Economies and the Level of Economic Development,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 17-30.
38- Williamson, J.G. (1965), “Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-84.
39- World Bank (2001), “World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty”, New York:  OxfordUniversity Press.
Journal of Geography and Planning
Volume 17, Issue 46 - Serial Number 46
February 2014
Pages 111-146
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics