Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Ms.C student of Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Assistant Prof. of Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Sustainable livelihood approach is one of the new approaches in sustainable rural development that has been considered to reduce poverty and rural development. This approach focuses on the diversity and increase of various rural activities and emphasizes the diversity and increase of various rural activities. Sustaining the sustainable livelihood of the villagers in today's world is one of the priorities that should use the various assets (natural, human, financial, physical and social) of the villagers to improve and enhance their livelihood. The general purpose of this study is to evaluate the living conditions of rural communities in Darrehshahr city using SLF approach and CIPP model. Took. The total size of the statistical population was 16.140 households and the sample size was determined using Cochran's formula of 380 people.To analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used using SPSS software. The obtained results show that there is a significant difference between the studied villages in terms of livelihood assets. Friedman test also shows that the share of natural assets is higher in the studied villages and the share of human, social, natural, physical and financial assets is 3.39, 3.30, 3.59, 1.33, 3.39, respectively.
Data and Method
The present research is non-experimental in terms of application type, non-experimental in terms of data collection and survey type. The statistical population of the study includes 16140 rural households living in Darhshahr city, which has a population of about 58429. The sample size was obtained based on Cochran's formula of 380 households. The data collection tool in this study is a structured and researcher-made questionnaire. SPSS software was used to analyze the data. The collection tools in this research include library and field methods. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed using a panel of experts, and for the reliability of Cronbach's alpha used, its total value (0.73) was obtained. The independent variables of this research include five variables (human, physical, social, natural and financial) and the dependent variable is sustainable livelihood. The following hypotheses have been used in this study.
Results and Discussion
The results show that among 380 respondents, 60.86% were men and 90.12% were women, of which 2.14% were literate, 17.4% were middle school students, 9.33% were diploma students, and 6.6% were graduates. , 14.2% were associates and 6.6% were bachelors and above. Also, 3.70% were self-employed, 3.19% were government employees, 8.5% were retired, 1.8% were unemployed and 9.2% were students.
Conclusion
Regarding physical capital, the findings showed that the situation of marketing of agricultural products and products and the infrastructure of agricultural activities is very weak, while the main livelihood of the villages under study is provided by agriculture. .
Regarding the natural factors, the findings showed that the recent droughts have had the greatest impact on the living conditions of the studied villages, which is consistent with the results of Bazrafshan et al. 1397 and Darban Astana et al., 1397.
Regarding financial factors, the findings showed that fluctuations related to agricultural products have a great impact on people's lives. Also, the findings showed that investment to create employment by the government and the willingness of the private sector to invest in the villages studied is very low It is very high, which is consistent with the results of research by Weiss et al., 2017
. Regarding humanities, the findings showed that the level of access to educational services on livelihood and employment issues, unemployment rate at different ages and the status of courses and educational programs related to livelihood is very low. Which is in accordance with the results of Jamehpour and Ahmadi research, 2011. Also, the spirit of cooperation and cooperation and family relations among the residents of the studied villages is high in terms of livelihood activities, which is consistent with the results of Bazrafshan et al. 1397.
Regarding social factors, the findings showed that the tendency of villagers to urban life and the departure of labor and youth migration to urban areas is very high, which contradicts the results of research by Jomehpour and Ahmadi, 2011. Also, the level of use of media and social networks is very low.
Keywords
Main Subjects
- اعظمی، موسی، هاشمی امین، ناهید، 1396، تحلیل تأثیرات شرکتهای کشت و صنعت بر داراییهای خانوارهای کارگران شاغل با رویکرد معیشت پایدار ( مورد مطالعه: کشت و صنعت میاندوآب خوزستان)، پژوهش های روستایی، 4، 591-606.
- بذرافشان، جواد، طولابی نژاد، مهرشاد، حملی، نجمه، 1397، بررسی عوامل و محرکهای تغییر الگوی معیشت روستاهای مناطق مرزی مورد مطالعه دهستان مینان شهرستان سرباز، تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 49، 127-150.
- توکلی، مرتصی، احمدی، شیرکو، فاضل نیا، غریب، 1395، تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر معیشت روستایی بررسی موردی روستاهای شهرستان سردشت، 58، 63-81.
- دربان آستانه، علیرضا.، مطیعی لنگرودی، سیدحسن. و قاسمی، فریبا. 1396، شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر معیشت پایدار کشاورزان. مورد مطالعه : شهرستان شازند، مجله پژوهشهای روستایی، تابستان1397، شماره2: 324 - 327.
- سجاسی قیداری، حمدالله، صادقلو، طاهره، شکوری فرد، اسماعیل، 1395، سنجش سطح داراییهای معیشتی در مناطق روستایی با رویکرد معیشت پایدار مطالعه موردی روستاهای شهرستان تایباد، 1395، 197-216.
- صرافی، مظفر. شمسایی، مصطفی. 1391. عوامل مؤثر بر شکلگیری سکونتگاههای غیررسمی شهری و راهبرد بقای خانوار.مورد پژوهی: محله اسلامآباد منطقه شهرداری تهران، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، ایران.
- کریمی، کبری، کرمی دهکردی، اسماعیل، 1394، بهرهبرداری از مراتع و لزوم متنوع معیشت خانوارهای روستایی مطالعه موردی شهرستان ماهنشان، پژوهش های روستایی، 2، 343- 368.
- مهدی زاده، حسین، علی بیگی، جواد، 1395، بررسی صنایع کوچک بهبود معیشت خانوارهای روستایی بررسی موردی : شهرستان سیروانچرداول، شماره4، 139- 155.
- ویسی، فرزاد، صدیق قربانی، محمد، داستوار، عدنان، 1396، تحلیل اثر بازارچههای مرزی بر معیشت پایدار پسکرانههای روستایی موردمطالعه بخش خاو میرآباد شهرستان مریوان، شماره 8، 521-533
- Allison, E, Elice, f, 2001, The Livelihood Approach and Management of Small-scale Fisheries, Marine Policy, 25, 377-388.
- Bebbington, Anthony, 1999, Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty, World Development, 27, 2021-2044.
- Barrett, C, B, Reardon, T, Webb, P, 2001, Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts dynamics and policy implicatio Food Policy.26, 315-331.
- Belecher, B, Bastide, F, casteella, j c, Boissiere, m, 2012, development of a village level live lihood monitoring tool: Acase- study in veingkam District, Lao pdr international foresty review, 14.
- Colombo, E., Romeo, F., Mattarolo, L., Barbier, J. Morazzo, M. 2018. An impact evaluation framework based on sustainable livelihoods for energy development projects: an application to Ethiopia. Energy Research & Social Science. 39: 78-92.
- Ideas for development. Earth Scan Publication, London, Sterling VA Chambers, Robert, 2005,
- Department for International Development (DFID), 1999, Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: Department for International Development.
- Department for inter national development, 2008, sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets London ,1 -8.
- Fourance, p, 2001, Transport and sustainable rural livelihood, rural transport knowledge base, rural travel and transport program Washington D. C: world bank.
- Mbaiwaa, Joseph E, Stronzab, Amanda l, 2010, “The effects of tourism development on rural livelihoods in the Okavango Delta”, Botswana, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18,635-656.
- Morse, s. 2013, The hheory behind the sustainable livelihood approach, in: s, morse & Mcnamara. sustainable livelihood Approach: A critique of theory and practice.brline: springer, 15-60.
- Pravakar, Pijush, Sarker, Bhakta, Rahman, Mahabubar, and Hossain, Beial, 2013, present ststus of fish Farming and Livelihood of Fish farmares in shanrastiupazila of chandpur District, Bangladesh, American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 13, 391-397.
- Udayakumara, E P N, Shrestha, RP, (2011). Assessing livelihood for improvement: Samanalawewa reservoir environs, Sri Lanka, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(4), 366-376
- Shen, Fujun, 2009, Tourism and Sustainable Livelihoods Approach: Application within the Chinese context, Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln university.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), International Fund for Agriculture Development & Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2008, The importance of agroindustry for socio-economic development and poverty reduction . Paper presented at The Side-Event on How Agro-Industry Can Help Eradicate Poverty, New York, USA,
- Wang, Na, Gao, Ying, Wang, Youghong, Li, Xiangfei, 2016, Adoption of ecofriendly soil- management practices by smallholder farmers in Shandong Province of China, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.62,185-193.
- Yaro, Joseph Awetori, 2006, Is deagrarianisation real? A study of livelihood activities in rural northern Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 44, 125- 156.