Investigating the role of resilience on tourism during the crisis of epidemics (case study: Shiraz city)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Geography Group- Yazd University

Abstract

Tourism becomes the largest and most diverse industry in the world, which, as the main source of income and work, plays an important role in the economic growth of the countries of the world. Accidents and crises play the role of inhibiting the development of the industry. Epidemics are distinguished from other crises by the fact that they usually leave the local government. Resilience strategy for quick recovery of destinations affected by the crisis has been introduced. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a research with the aim of investigating the role of resilience in the epidemic crisis in tourist cities. The present research method is analytical-descriptive in nature and it is a survey type by completing a questionnaire. At first, the path analysis model was used to determine the factors on the tourism resilience of the studied city (Shiraz) during the epidemic crisis. Therefore, according to the number of research criteria, the multiple regression test was implemented, which was directly considered first. The combination of resilience is determined as an independent variable on Shiraz as dependent changes. It is considered indirect in the next steps. In the stages of direct research, all research indicators have a significant effect on the dependent variable and there is a significant linear relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable. The most direct effect is related to the social-cultural index and the most indirect effect is related to the economic index. In total, the social-cultural index has the highest correlation coefficient among the resilience indices, which indicates the most influential index on the epidemic crisis in Shiraz tourism. The economic index is on the second level. Finally, infrastructure and institutional-organizational indicators are placed in the next ranks with small distances.

Highlights

According to the respondents, the most important aspects during the epidemic crisis are economic, infrastructure, socio-cultural and finally institutional-management aspects. In the economic dimension, the indicator of the amount of income from the tourism sector has the greatest effect on the resilience of the city of Shiraz during the crisis, and the least is the indicator of the dependence of the host city on the tourism economy. According to the respondents, in the socio-cultural dimension during the epidemic crisis in Shiraz city, the use of advertising and media in order to attract tourists, in the infrastructure dimension, the indicator "the presence of necessary medical equipment in the host city" in the institutional-management dimension, the training of capable managers during the epidemic crisis can have the most positive effect on resilience.

In measuring the direct effects of socio-cultural, economic, infrastructure, and finally institutional-management criteria, respectively, they have the largest contribution in predicting the dependent variable. The correlation between resilience indicators as an independent variable on the dependent variable (tourism) is 0.890, which is a strong correlation. There is a significant linear relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable at the 95% level.

In order to obtain the influencing factors on the resilience of Shiraz tourism against the epidemic crisis, the path analysis method has been used. The results indicate the absence of multi-linearity between the independent variables, and therefore, the direct effects obtained for each independent variable are reliable. In general, in the direct and indirect effects of the correlation coefficient of the resilience indicators, the socio-cultural index has the highest correlation coefficient among the resilience indicators, which indicates the most influential index on the epidemic crisis in Shiraz tourism.

 

Conclusion

Contrary to the opinion of many researchers who pay special attention to economic indicators, in this research it is clear that socio-cultural indicators are more important than economic indicators in resilience against the epidemic crisis. The indicators of socio-cultural dimension during the epidemic crisis should be specially considered. But this issue is not the reason for the unimportance and low importance of other dimensions. Governments should pay attention to all this when a crisis occurs. Even the institutional-management dimension, which has the least impact on the epidemic crisis among the resilience indicators, should also be taken into consideration

Keywords

Main Subjects


امروزه گردشگری بزرگترین و متنوع‌ترین صنعت دنیا محسوب می‌شود که به مثابه منبع اصلی درآمد و اشتغال، نقش مهمی در رشد اقتصادی کشورها دارد. سوانح و بحران‌ها نقش بازدارندگی توسعه گردشگری را بازی می‌کنند. در این بین اپیدمی‌ها به این خاطر که معمولاً فراتر از مقیاس محلی، کشورها را متأثر می‌کنند از سایر بحران‌ها متمایز می‌باشد. استراتژی تاب‌آوری جهت بازیابی سریع مقاصد تحت تأثیر بحران معرفی شده است. بنابراین ضرورت انجام پژوهشی با هدف بررسی نقش تاب‌آوری در بحران اپیدمی‌ در شهرهای گردشگری ایجاب می‌نماید. روش تحقیق حاضر از نظر ماهیت تحلیلی-توصیفی می‌باشد و از نوع پیمایشی از طریق تکمیل پرسشنامه انجام شده است. در ابتدا برای مشخص کردن عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری گردشگری شهر مورد مطالعه (شیراز) در زمان بحران اپیدمی، از مدل تحلیل مسیر استفاده شد. از همین رو و با توجه به تعداد معیارهای تحقیق، آزمون رگرسیون چندگانه اجرا شد که ابتدا اثرات مستقیم مدنظر قرار گرفته شد. اثرات ابعاد تاب‌آوری(اقتصادی، اجتماعی-فرهنگی، زیرساختی و نهادی-مدیریتی) بعنوان متغیر مستقل بر گردشگری شیراز بعنوان متغیر وابسته محاسبه گردید. در مراحل بعدی اثرات غیرمستقیم در نظر گرفته شد. در مرحله اثرات مستقیم معلوم شد که معیارهای تحقیق 71% از واریانس بحران اپیدمی را تبیین می‌کنند و اینکه تمام شاخص‌های تحقیق بر متغیر وابسته تأثیر معناداری دارند و بین متغیرهای مستقل و متغیر وابسته رابطه خطی معناداری در سطح 95 درصد وجود دارد. در این خصوص بیشترین تأثیر مستقیم مربوط به شاخص اجتماعی-فرهنگی و بیشترین تأثیر غیرمستقیم متعلق به شاخص اقتصادی است. در مجموع شاخص فرهنگی- اجتماعی بیشترین ضریب همبستگی را در بین شاخص‌های‌تاب‌آوری داراست که نشانگر تأثیرگذارترین شاخص بر بحران اپیدمی در گردشگری شهر شیراز است. شاخص اقتصادی در درجه ‌دوم قرار دارد. در نهایت شاخص‌های زیرساخت و نهادی- سازمانی با فاصله‌های کم در رتبه‌های ‌بعدی قرار می‌گیرند.

  • Allan,G., Connolly, K., Figus, G., Maurya, A., (2022); Economic impacts of COVID-19 on inbound and domestic tourism, Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 3 (2):1-12
  • Au, A. K. M., Ramasamy, B. R. & Yeung, M. C. H., (2005), The effects of SARS on the Hong Kong tourism industry: An empirical Evaluation, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 10 (1):85-95
  • Boto-García, D., Mayor, M.(2022); Domestic tourism and the resilience of hotel demand; Annals of Tourism Research, 93(1):1-16
  • Cao, W. Fang, L. & Xiao, D.(2019), What we have learnt from the SARS epdemics in mainland China?, The 70th anniversary of the founding of the people's republic of china: prevention and control of major communicable diseases, Global Health Journal, 3(3): 55-59
  • Cartier, E. A., Taylor, L. L.(2020), Living in a wildfire: The relationship between crisis management and community resilience in a tourism-based destination, Tourism Management Perspectives, 34(1): 1-12
  • Chelleri, L., Baravikovab, A. (2021), Understandings of urban resilience meanings and principles across Europe, Cities, 108(2):1-12
  • Chen, J., Guo, X., Pan, H., Zhong, S.(2021), What determines city’s resilience against epidemic outbreak: evidence from China’s COVID-19 experience; Sustainable Cities and Society, 70(1):1-11
  • Choi, Y. E., Oh, C. ,Chon, J.(2021), Applying the resilience principles for sustainable ecotourism development: A case study of the Nakdong Estuary, South Korea, Tourism Management, 83(3):1-11
  • Duro, J.A., Perez-Laborda, A., Fernandez, M.(2022), Territorial tourism resilience in the COVID-19 summer, Annals of Tourism Research Empirical insights, 3(1):1-9
  • Gabriel-Campos, E, Werner-Masters, K., Cordova-Buiza, F., Paucar-Caceres, A. (2021), Community eco-tourism in rural Peru: Resilience and adaptive capacities to the Covid-19 pandemic and climate, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Man, 48(4): 416- 427
  • Han, S., Yoon, A., Kim, M.J., Yoon, J.H.(2022); What influences tourist behaviors during and after the COVID-19 pandemic? Focusing on theories of risk, coping, and resilience, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50(1): 355-365
  • Huck, A., Monstadt, J., Driessen, P. (2020), Building urban and infrastructure resilience through connectivity: An institutional perspective on disaster risk management in Christchurch, New Zealand, Cities, 98(1):1-15
  • Jang, S., Kim, J. (2022), Remedying Airbnb COVID-19 disruption through tourism clusters and community resilience, Journal of Business Research, 139(2):529-542
  • Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., Verreynne, M. L.(2021), Developing disaster resilience: A processual and reflective approach,Tourism Management, 87(3): 1-15
  • Jiang, Y., Wen, J., Zheng, D., Phau, I., Wang, W.(2022); Pandemic prevention via tourism: A conceptual framework, Annals of Tourism Research, 96(1): 1-4
  • Jooa, H., Henry, R. E, Leeb, Y. K., Berroa, A.D. & Maskery, B. A.(2019), The effects of past SARS experience and proximity on declines in numbers of travelers to the Republic of Korea during the 2015 MERS outbreak: A retrospective study, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 30(4): 54-66
  • Li, G., Kou, C., Wen, F. (2021), The dynamic development process of urban resilience: From the perspective of interaction and feedback, Cities, 114(2): 1-20
  • Lindsay-Smith, G., Pyke, J., Gamage, A., Nguyen, V., Lacy,T.D.(2022); Tourism operator mental health and its relationship with SME organisational resilience during disasters; Tourism Management Perspectives, 42(4): 1-15
  • McKercher, B. & Chon , K., (2004), The Over-Reaction to SARS and the Collapse of Asian Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3): 716–719
  • Novelli, M., Burgess, L. G., Jones, A., Ritchie, B. W.,(2018), No Ebola…still doomed’– The Ebola-induced tourism crisis, Annals of Tourism Research, 70(2): 76–87
  • Okafor, L., Khalid, U., Gopalan, S., (2022); COVID-19 economic policy response, resilience and tourism recovery, Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 3(2),1-12
  • Park, E., Kim, W.H., Kim, S.B., (2022), How does COVID-19 differ from previous crises? A comparative study of health-related crisis research in the tourism and hospitality context; International Journal of Hospitality Management; 103(2): 1-12
  • Quynh Pham, L.D., Coles, T., Ritchie, B.W., Wang,J., (2021), Building business resilience to external shocks: Conceptualising the role of social networks to small tourism & hospitality businesses, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48(3): 210-219
  • Ritchie, W.B. & Jiang, Y.,(2019), A review of research on tourism risk, crisis and disaster management: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on tourism risk, crisis and disaster management, Annals of Tourism Research, 79(1): 1-15
  • Romao, J., (2020), Tourism, smart specialisation, growth, and resilience, Annals of Tourism Research, 84(2):1-15
  • Rossello, J., Becken, S., Santana-Gallego, , (2020), The effects of natural disasters on international tourism: A global analysis, Tourism Management; 79(3): 1-10
  • Santos, A., Teixeria, M. B.,(2020), The contribution of tourism to the renegeration of cities: a route for change, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 12(6): 761-766
  • Sharma, G. D., Thomas, A., Paul, J., (2020), Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework, Tourism Management Perspectives, 37(4): 1-11
  • Shekari, F., Ziaee, M., Faghihi, M., Jomehpour, M.(2022), Nomadic livelihood resilience through tourism, Annals of Tourism Research Empirical, 3(1):1-11
  • Sifolo, N.,(2015), The tourism inconvenience of the Ebola epidemic: lessons for the South African tourism sector, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 65(5): 1-11
  • Skare, M., Soriano, D. R., Porada-Rochon, M.(2021), Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 163(3):1-14
  • Soliku, O., Kyiire,B., Mahama, A., Kubio, C.(2020); Tourism amid COVID-19 pandemic: impacts and implications for building resilience in the eco-tourism sector in Ghana's Savannah region, Heliyon, 7(3): 1-10
  • Su, D.N., Truong, T.M., Luu, T.T., Thi Huynh, H.M., O’Mahony,B.,(2022), Career resilience of the tourism and hospitality workforce in the COVID-19: The protection motivation theory perspective, Tourism Management Perspectives, 44(3): 1-12
  • Wardekkera, A. ,Wilka, B. ,Browna, V.,Uittenbroeka, C.,Meesa, H. ,Driessena, P.,Wassena, M. ,Molenaard, A.,Waldad, J.,Runhaar. H.(2020), A diagnostic tool for supporting policymaking on urban resilience, Cities, 101(4): 1-13
  • Wieczorek-Kosmala, M.(2022), A study of the tourism industry’s cash-driven resilience capabilities for responding to the COVID-19 shock, Tourism Management, 88(1):1-15
  • UNWTO.ORG
  • Yang, E., Kim,J., Hwang,C.S.(2022), The spatial moderating effect of environmental pollution on the relationship between tourism and community resilience, Tourism Management, 93(3): 1-8
  • Yang, Y., Zhang, C.X., Rickly, J.(2021), A review of early COVID-19 research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research's Curated Collection on coronavirus and tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 91(2):1-17
  • Yin, X. , Li, J.(2021), Development of cultural tourism platform based on FPGA and convolutional neural network, Microprocessors and Microsystems, 80(3):1-6