Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz.

Abstract

Introduction
Planning as a regulatory process between public and private goals, as a result of the actions of individuals and groups deviates from its regulatory path and acts in a specific direction. This competition, influenced by power, has its own manifestation in the urban environment.
The urban revolution and the consideration of the city as a spatial object, according to Lefebvre, put this socio-economic entity on a path that was increasingly attacked by capitalism, and the reproduction of artificial spaces for the accumulation of capital intensified.
This reproduction is done in a set of rules and regulations and management policies that should, in fact, allocate space for public use, While the objective function of this city management organization has collapsed in favor of capital. This point has its own conditions in cities with rentier system. This is because in rentier systems, decentralization policies and, consequently, the strengthening of local institutions and urban management, in the absence of democratic conditions, have created a suitable environment for creating various types of rents and sometimes corruption.
When urban space is considered as a commodity for possession, in this process urban management has its own impact. Sometimes as a law enforcement officer and sometimes as a competitor with private capital over urban space. All of this can be described as rent-seeking, in which individuals and groups try to divert resources to their advantage. All of these influences and everything that happens in the urban space are based on factors and contexts that seem to be rooted in the rentier political economy that governs the city system. Therefore, the present study tries to identify and explain the effective factors and contexts.
Materials and methods
The present study can be considered as applied in terms of purpose, although it has also been developed and theoretically explained. Also, the approach is descriptive-analytical, which based on the data obtained from documentary studies, as well as conducting interviews and using a questionnaire, has analyzed the context of rent in Tabriz Municipality.
For conducting interviews, open-ended questions have been designed and presented to a number of managers and experts in the field of urban management in the metropolis of Tabriz.
The results, after theoretical saturation and combination with the results of documentary studies, are extracted in the form of propositions and form the basis of a questionnaire that is left to the judgment of elites and experts to determine the importance and degree of effectiveness of each criterion in the occurrence of rent and rent-seeking phenomenon. For this purpose, the Mick Mac questionnaire was used. This method is based on the analysis of interaction / structural effects.
Results and discussion
The requirement for analyzing variables using Mick Mac software is to determine their interactions in the form of an effect matrix that acts as software input.
 
To do this, a 39 * 39 matrix was set and the relationships between the variables in terms of effectiveness were determined based on the opinions of selected experts in a purposeful sampling way. The number of repetitions considered in the software is twice and the degree of filling is 68.63%. This indicates that they have affected each other in more than 68% of cases. Out of 1269 relationships that can be evaluated in the matrix, 580 cases were unrelated (number zero), 379 cases were weak relationship (number one), 585 cases were moderate relationship (number two) and 305 cases were strong relationship (number three). The pattern of distribution of research variables indicates that the system is unstable.
The distribution model shows that macroeconomic factors of political economy generally have high impact and low impressible, and in contrast, the factors that are most impressible are the result of decisions and macro-political and economic environment.
Such a situation indicates the power of external and extra-organizational factors to determine the status of the system. impressible factors or results are also factors that are affected by the macro-political environment and political economy and operate mostly at the organizational and local level, in other words, they are the output of the performance of macro-decisions and events.
In the structural / interaction analysis matrix, the sum of the row numbers for each variable indicates the effect of the variable and the sum of the columns of each variable indicates its Impressive. According to the matrix results, the variables related to the "political economy factor" have the most impact on the system (the occurrence of the rent phenomenon) and the variables related to the "psychological factor" have the least impact.
Also in terms of impressiveness, the variables related to "organizational factor" have the most impressiveness and the variables related to "legal factor" have the least. Based on the results of direct and indirect effects, the variable of power centers has the highest score. Also, all the identified key variables from rank one to 16 are repeated in direct and indirect impact, and the differences are only in their rank.
Conclusion
The present study seeks to identify and explain the factors affecting the formation of the phenomenon of rent and rent-seeking in the urban management organization. For this purpose, while conducting interviews with experts and managers related to urban management, first, 39 variables under 7 factors of political, political, economic, legal, organizational, socio-cultural and psychological economics were extracted.
In the next step, using a questionnaire, the effectiveness of these variables was determined using the interaction / structural impact analysis method. In the next step, Mick Mac software was used to identify how the variables affect each other and identify key factors. The results of the software output can be summarized as follows;
- Based on the pattern of distribution of variables, the system has an unstable state and the types of variables - influential, impressive, independent, regulatory and two-dimensional - can be identified in it.
- The most effective is related to the variables of "political economy" and the least effective is related to the variables of "psychological".
- In terms of impressiveness, the most impressiveness is related to "organizational" factor variables and the lowest impressiveness is related to "legal" factor variables.
 
The key variables resulting from direct and indirect effects are identified as 16 variables, all of which are fixed and the differences are only related to their rank. These variables include;
Centers of power, oil economy, lack of transparency, Clientelism policy, centralism, establishment of rentier state, weakness of popular institutions, government tenure, political influence, electoral assistance, desirability of rent-seeking among social groups, golden signatures, lobbying, the prevailing spirit of rent-seeking, the rule of the technocratic tradition among managers and the legal cases underlying rent.
- Variables related to political economy are generally variables that have macro dimensions and in most cases are beyond the control of the local level of urban management. Local level variables are generally related to organizational factors that are generally the result of the performance of macro factors such as political economy. On the other hand, the variables related to political economy can be described as contextual variables that use their micro-organizational variables as tools to make their impact operational.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • اطهاری، کمال(1389). اقتصاد شهری و اقتصاد شهری در ایران. مجله اقتصاد شهر، 7، 65-56.
  • آذر, عادل؛ امیرخانی، طیبه(1395). سیاه چاله های بودجه در نظام بودجه ریزی ایران. نشریه مدیریت دولتی. 8(4) 590-571.
  • برهانی، کاظم؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ مشکینی، ابوالفضل(1396). تغییرات کاربری زمین شهری و اقتصاد سیاسی فضا: ارائه مدل مفهومی تلفیقی. مجله جامعه شناسی ایران. دوره هجدهم، شماره3، 109-86.
  • بشیریه، حسین(1382).موانع توسعه سیاسی در ایران ، تهران، نشر گام نو.
  • بنیاد تدبیرگران توسعه فردا(بنیاد توسعه فردا) (1392). روش‌های آینده‌نگاری تکنولوژی، تهران، نشر بنیاد توسعه فردا.
  • بیدرام، رسول(1390). بررسی زمینه های رانت جویی در ساختار بودجه ای شهرداری ها و ارتباط آن با کارایی؛ نمونه موردی شهرداری های کلانشهرها. نشریه مدیریت شهری. ویژه نامه بهار و تابستان 1390. 82-61.
  • حاجی یوسفی، امیرمحمد(1388). دولت، نفت و توسعه اقتصادی در ایران، تهران، انتشارات مرکز اسناد انقلاب اسلامی.
  • حسینی، سیدمصطفی(1389). رولت رانتیر و انقلاب اسلامی در ایران. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه مازندران.
  • خضری، محمد(1384). تحلیل نهادی فساد در ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی. سال هشتم،3، 530-513.
  • خندان، مینا؛ جهانشاهلو، لعلا؛ ذبیحی، حسین(1398). واکاوی عوامل موثر بر افزایش رانت زمین شهری در منطقه 1 کلانشهر تهران. فصلنامه برنامه ریزی منطقه ای. سال نهم، 2، 255-239.
  • دانایی فرد، حسن(1387). چالش­های مدیریت شهری در ایران، تهران: سمت.
  • درویشی، فرزانه(1391). بررسی تاثیر سیاست های رانتیر بر نوسانات بازار زمین شهری؛ مناطق دهگانه تبریز. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه تبریز.
  • سردارآبادی، خلیل(1384). قدرت و رانت جویی سیاسی. نشریه گزارش، 167، 33-30.
  • سعیدی فرد، فرانک؛ رضویان، محمدتقی؛ قورچی، مرتضی(1397). تبیین بازتاب اقتصاد رانتی بر سازمان فضایی کلانشهرها؛ نمونه موردی منطقه 1 شهر تهران. نشریه پژوهش های دانش زمین. سال نهم، 34، 164-145.
  • شارع پور، محمود(1393). جامعه شناسی شهری، تهران، سمت.
  • شریعتی، شهروز(1386). چیستی و کاستی نظریه دولت رانتیر. فصلنامه راهبرد، 11، 122-104.
  • شریف زادگان، محمدحسین؛ قانونی، حسین(1396). تحلیل و مفهوم سازی نظری تاثیرات دولت رانتی بر عاملیت و ساختار جامعه و اقتصاد شهری در ایران. نشریه اقتصاد شهری، 2(1)، 18-1.
  • شکاری، عبدالقیوم(1379). نظریه دولت تحصیلدار و انقلاب اسلامی، تهران، مرکز اسناد انقلاب اسلامی.
  • شکویی، حسین(1383). اندیشه های نو در فسلفه جغرافیا. جلد دوم. تهران، انتشارات گیتاشناسی.
  • صامتی، مجید؛ بخشایش، الهام(1391). تحلیلی از شکل گیری رانت در ترکیب درآمدها در بودجه شهرداری اصفهان با تاکید بر فروش تراکم. فصلنامه پژوهش های اقتصادی. سال دوازدهم،3، 66-47.
  • صرافی، مظفر؛ توکلی نیا، جمیله، چمنی مقدم، مهدی(1394). کندوکاو در نقش دولت و اهداف غیررسمی در برنامه ریزی شهری ایران. نشریه صفه، 25(69)، 71-88.
  • طبیبیان، محمد(1371). رانت اقتصادی به عنوان یک مانع توسعه. نشریه برنامه و بودجه. 2(4)، 40-1.
  • طیب نیا، علی؛ زمان زاده، حمید؛ شادرخ، مهدیه(1393). نقش نهادها در بروز مصیبت یا موهبت منابع نفتی، یک الگوی رانت جویی با رویکرد تعادل عمومی تصادفی پویا. فصلنامه پژوهش های پولی- بانکی. سال هفتم، 21، 475-443.
  • قانونی، حسین(1396). تحلیل اثرات دولت رانتی بر برنامه‌ریزی شهری با تکیه بر تفکر نهادی (موردکاوی اصفهان). رساله دکتری برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشگاه اصفهان.
  • کاتوزیان، محمدعلی(1374). اقتصاد سیاسی کشورهای صادر کننده نفت. ترجمه علیرضا طیب. نشریه اطلاعات سیاسی و اقتصادی،95 و96 ، 98-92.
  • کارل، تریلین(1388). معمای فراوانی: رونق نفتی و دولت های نفتی. ترجمه جعفر خیرخواهان. تهران. نشر نی.
  • کاویانی، سوده(1388). تریالکتیک شهر (آنری لوفور و دیالکتیک نوین شهر). خردنامه همشهری، 35، 53-52.
  • لشگری تفرشی، احسان؛ رضایی، محمدرضا؛ کاویان پور، گلشن(1396). تبیین نظری کارکردهای قدرت سیاسی در فضای شهری. فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی. سال 32، 2، 66-52.
  • معصومی فر، امیرحسین(1396). تاثیر نظام تامین مالی مدیریت شهری بر حقوق شهروندی در کلانشهر تهران. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
  • میدری، احمد(1373). عدم تقارن اطلاعات؛ منبع رانت. نشریه راهبرد، 4، 62-43.
  • میرترابی، سعید(1385). مسائل نفت ایران ،تهران، نشر قومس.
  • میرترابی، سعید(1387). نفت، سیاست و دموکراسی، تهران، نشر قومس.
  • هاروی، دیوید(1387). شهری شدن سرمایه. ترجمه عارف اقوامی مقدم، تهران، انتشارات اختران.
  • هاروی، دیوید(1394). معماری سرمایه و بحران های سرمایه داری. ترجمه مجید امینی. چاپ دوم، تهران، نشر کلاغ.
  • یزدانی، فردین(1382). تولید رانت گرانیگاه نظام درآمدی شهرداری­ها. فصلنامه مدیریت شهری،13، 17-12.
  • Akerman, R. (1999). Political Corruption and Democracy. Journal of International Law, 14(2): 363-376.
  • Ali, S. Abdil Aziz, A. R (2017). Rent-seeking Behaviors in Property Development: A Literature Review. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING ENGINEERING (ICONBUILD) 2017: Smart Construction Towards Global Challenges. DOI: 1063/1.5011576.
  • Arcad, J., Godet, M., Meunire, F., Roubelat, F. (2003). Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & actors' strategy with MACTOR method. Futures Research Methodology, 7 (33), 20-41.
  • Arcade, J., Godet, M., Meunier, F. & Roubelat, F. (1999). Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & Actor's strategy with MACTOR method. Futures Research Methodology, American Council for the United Nations University: The Millennium Project, 1-69.
  • Bolarinwa, J. O. (2005). Bureaucratic corruption in Africa: the futility of cleanups. The Nigerian Journal of Economic History, 16(1): 164-185.
  • Buehler, B. (2014). What is the difference between corruption and rent seeking? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-corruption-and-rent-seeking.
  • M, and Schemeil, "towards a New political Economy of stste Industrialization in the Arab Middle East" (1984), International journal of middle East studies, 16: 251-265.
  • Corchon, L. C (2008). Forms of governance and the size of rent-seeking. Social Choice and Welfare,30(2): 197-210.
  • Cordella, T & Onder, H (2020). Sharing oil rents and political violence. European Journal of Political Economy. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101882.
  • Fox, L and Murphy, E. (2014). Informal strategies of power in the local planning system. Planning Theory. 13: 244 originally published online 25 June 2013.
  • -Hutchison, R, (2010). Encyclopedia of Urban Studies, USA. SAGE Publications.
  • Hyndman, K., and Ozbay, E. Y., and Sujarittanonta, P., (2012). Rent seeking with regretful agents: Theory and experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 84(3): 866-878.
  • Isham, J. Woolcock, M., Pritchett, L., & Busby, G. (2005). The varieties of resource experience: Natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth. World Bank Economic Review,19(2), 141-174.
  • Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1): 71-121.
  • Kahana, N., And Qijun, L., (2010). Endemic corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 26: 82-88.
  • Kruger, A. O, (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review, 64 (3): 291-303.
  • Lees, N., (2010). Inequality as an Obstacle to World Political Community and Global Social Justice, Oxford University, Paper to be Presented at the SGIR 7th Annual Conference on International Relations, Sweden, 9-11 September.
  • Macionis, J. J., and V. N. Parrillo. (2001). Cities and Urban Life. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • B. Murgante, B. (2017). The Dynamics of Urban Land Rent in Italian Regional Capital Cities. Land 6(3): 2-18.
  • Pearce, David. W (1992). The MIT dictionary of modern economics. MIT Press, 4th ed.
  • Toke, S. A (2016). Rent seeking and the economics of corruption. Const Polit Econ. 27:142–157.
  • Wiedmann, F ; Salama, A; Thierstein, A (2012). Urban evolution of the city of Doha; An investigation in to the impact of economic transformation on urban structure. Urban EV. 29(2): 35-61.